Every story ever published

The claim: “"Abdul El Sayed has failed the background check required for classified Senate briefings. The denial blocks him from any session that involves sensitive national security information." — X account @TrumpNews_Baby (posting as "Jonathan Gregory"), Nov. 8, 2026, in a wire-style post viewed about 2.7 million times”

Why we rated it this way: Section 3163 says the classified-access subchapter "shall not apply to the President and Vice President, Members of the Congress, Justices of the Supreme Court, and Federal judges," and the Congressional Research Service's clearance FAQ (R43216) says security clearances "are not mandated" for members of Congress, who are deemed eligible by virtue of their office. There is no background check a senator-elect sits for, so there is none to fail. The post cites only unnamed "officials who conduct the clearances," and no Senate, agency or press record shows any denial.

What would change our rating: A Senate, Office of Senate Security or intelligence-agency document showing El-Sayed was reviewed and barred from classified briefings, or a change in law requiring clearances for members of Congress, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"Following investigations, France is now in a position to attribute these destructive actions to Iran: they were carried out by SHAHID KAVEH, an offensive cyber unit affiliated with the Electronic Warfare and Cyber Defense Organization of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps," the ministry continued. — Greg Norman-Diamond, Fox News Digital live updates, Nov. 10, 2026, reporting that France's foreign ministry said Oct. 11-12 attacks hit the refrigeration controls of more than 700 retail sites”

Why we rated it this way: The ministry's Nov. 10 statement says that in the night of Oct. 11 to 12 attacks hit the supermarket refrigeration controls of more than 700 retail sites, causing fires and food losses worth tens of millions of euros, and attributes them to SHAHID KAVEH, an IRGC-affiliated cyber unit, in the words Fox quotes. It says France "is going to summon" Iran's ambassador and will propose further EU sanctions. Fox's lead says the ministry "summoned" the ambassador, while the statement itself announces the summons as a coming step; the attribution is France's finding, and Iran has rejected it.

What would change our rating: A French government correction or withdrawal of the attribution, or a published investigation tying the Oct. 11-12 attacks to a different actor, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"A new poll released as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth faces possible impeachment shows 7 in 10 Americans — and even about half of Republicans — want Congress to vote to end the Iran war. ... The survey also showed that 62% of Americans — including 32% of Republicans — want Congress to pass legislation ending Trump's tariffs." — Aaron Blake, CNN analysis, live updates, Nov. 10, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The topline shows 71% of all adults support the new Congress "passing legislation to end the conflict with Iran," including 51% of Republicans and 93% of Democrats, and 62% support legislation to eliminate the Trump administration's tariffs, including 32% of Republicans. It also shows 33% say impeachment efforts against Trump would be good for the country and 42% bad, as CNN reports. The question asked about passing legislation, not about any specific method such as cutting funds or impeaching Hegseth, which CNN itself notes.

What would change our rating: A corrected Ipsos topline with different figures, or evidence that CNN's numbers came from a different subgroup or question than the all-adults legislation question, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"Does anybody really believe that this 'Election' was honest. ... Some early voting 'dumps' were so large that it was impossible to win, no matter how many people went to vote. It's all about the machines, which are far more important than the voter!" — President Donald Trump, Truth Social, Nov. 9, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The archived post confirms Trump wrote these words, but it names no state, county, race, ballot batch, vote total or voting machine, so there is nothing in it that can be checked against an official count. Results are still being finalized: Mississippi counties have until Nov. 13 to certify and Virginia certifies in early December, and no certified result or official finding cited in the post shows early votes or machines changing an outcome. The Guardian notes that last week Trump told The New York Times he was "absolutely willing" to accept the midterm results.

What would change our rating: Trump or the White House identifying specific jurisdictions and early-vote batches, or an election official, audit, recount or court finding that early-vote counts or voting machines produced wrong totals, would let this be graded as matching or contradicting the record.

The claim: “"During Trump's first term, he was impeached by the House in 2019 but was acquitted by the Senate months later. After the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, the president was impeached again, but was ultimately acquitted by the Senate." — Lindsay Kornick, Fox News Digital, Nov. 9, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: House Roll Call 695 shows the House adopted Article I of H.Res. 755 by 230 to 197 on Dec. 18, 2019, and Senate Vote 33 shows the Senate found Trump not guilty 52 to 48 on Feb. 5, 2020. House Roll Call 17 shows the House impeached him again under H.Res. 24 by 232 to 197 on Jan. 13, 2021, a week after the Capitol riot and still in his first term. Senate Vote 59 on Feb. 13, 2021 shows 57 guilty votes to 43, a majority but short of the two-thirds needed to convict, so "acquitted" is accurate even though that trial took place after he had left office.

What would change our rating: An official House or Senate record showing a different outcome for either impeachment or trial vote, such as a conviction or a vote on different dates, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"Kansas on Tuesday elected a Democrat to the US Senate for the first time since the Great Depression. ... since Kansas became a state in 1861, Sen.-elect Adam Hamilton will be only the fourth Democrat to represent it in Senate history." — Alex Leeds Matthews and Zachary B. Wolf, CNN, Nov. 9, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The Senate's Kansas roster lists exactly three Democrats since statehood in 1861: John Martin (1893–1895), William H. Thompson (1913–1919) and George McGill (Dec. 1930–Jan. 1939), while the 1890s senators William Peffer and William Harris are listed as Populists, so Hamilton would be the fourth. McGill's service spans the Great Depression and every Kansas senator since 1939 is a Republican, which fits CNN's line, though the roster gives service dates rather than election years. Hamilton's win itself rests on CNN's projection, since Kansas has not yet certified its results.

What would change our rating: Certified Kansas results showing Hamilton did not win, or a Senate Historical Office correction listing another Democratic senator from Kansas, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 ... What makes it strange: It didn't matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% ... Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level" — viral X post by the account "Truth is Freedom" (@TruthAnswersAll), Nov. 6, 2026 (documented by Lead Stories, Nov. 8, 2026)”

Why we rated it this way: The Federal Election Commission's official 2024 presidential results put Donald Trump at 45.5 percent in Maine (377,977 of 831,375 votes), 71.6 percent in Wyoming (192,633 of 269,048), and 56.1 percent in Texas (6,393,597 of 11,388,674). Multiplying those shares by 0.85 would predict Republican Senate totals of about 38.6 percent in Maine, 60.9 percent in Wyoming, and 47.7 percent in Texas. Instead, unofficial official-count compilations show Sen. Susan Collins at about 47.0 percent in Maine (332,803 of 708,873) — higher than Trump's 2024 share, not 15 points lower — Harriet Hageman at 64.9 percent in Wyoming (122,157 of 188,293, matching the Wyoming secretary of state's unofficial statewide summary), and Ken Paxton at 43.0 percent in Texas (4,249,373 of 9,889,704). Those gaps, in both directions, contradict the claim that one 15 percent formula fit "all of it" or produced the "same 15% decrease almost everywhere."

What would change our rating: Certified 2026 Senate canvasses showing Republican vote shares equal to 85 percent of Trump's official 2024 share in those states, including a Maine Republican share near 38.6 percent rather than above Trump's 2024 total, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"Democrats now control the governor’s office and both chambers of the state legislature in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Nevada. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, already enacted by 18 states and Washington, D.C., has 222 electoral votes pledged to it — 48 short of the 270 needed to take effect. If the four states join, their combined 50 electoral votes would push the compact to 272 and activate it. Arizona could push the total to 283 if Democrats ultimately gain control of both chambers there." — Fox News, Alec Schemmel, Nov. 8, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The National Conference of State Legislatures lists the same 18 states plus D.C. and the same 222 pledged electoral votes, 48 short of the 270 needed for the compact to take effect. The National Archives' current allocation, used for the 2024 and 2028 presidential elections, assigns Michigan 15 votes, Pennsylvania 19, Wisconsin 10, and Nevada 6, which add to 50, and Arizona 11, which would bring a 222-plus-50 total to 283. NBC News, citing the Associated Press, reported Democrats won trifectas in those four states. The missing piece is Arizona: Fox's Nov. 8 story still treated control of "both chambers there" as unsettled, but the AP had already called the Arizona House on Friday, Nov. 6, after calling the Senate earlier in the week, and KTAR reported Democrats were on track for a 20-10 Senate supermajority and a 37-23 House majority.

What would change our rating: An official Arizona canvass reversing Democratic control of either legislative chamber, or a correction showing the compact's pledged electoral-vote total is not 222, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"Jeffries told CNN he wants to use as a model this summer's housing bill, which passed with bipartisan support and became law in July after the president let enough days go by without action." — CNN, Edward-Isaac Dovere, Nov. 8, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: Congress.gov's official actions list for H.R. 6644, the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, shows the bill was presented to the president on June 29, 2026, "Sent to Archivist of the United States unsigned" on July 11, 2026, and "Became Public Law No: 119-101" the same day. The public-law text carries that July 11, 2026, enactment date. The House's final vote sending the bicameral package to the president was 358 to 32, and the Senate had passed the measure 89 to 10 and later concurred 85 to 5, matching CNN's description of a bipartisan bill that became law in July without the president's signature.

What would change our rating: A Congress.gov or Government Publishing Office correction showing the bill was signed or vetoed rather than sent to the Archivist unsigned, or that it did not become law in July 2026, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"The CLARITY Act is CANCELLED! The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is CANCELLED! No more deals, no more meme coins. The crypto people wanted this, and now they have it. SAD!" — text presented as a @realDonaldTrump Truth Social post in an X post by @Defi_Warhol, Nov. 5, 2026 (documented by Lead Stories, Nov. 6, 2026)”

Why we rated it this way: The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve exists by Executive Order 14233, and the Federal Register lists no revoking or amending order as of Nov. 7, 2026, so nothing in the record shows it was “CANCELLED.” Lead Stories searched Trump’s Truth Social account and the Trump’s Truth archive and found no post containing the quoted text. The CLARITY Act was never law to cancel; per Lead Stories it passed the House in July 2025 and stalled in a 49-50 Senate procedural vote on Sept. 15, 2026.

What would change our rating: An authentic @realDonaldTrump Truth Social status with this text and a verifiable status ID, or a new executive order in the Federal Register revoking EO 14233, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"U.S. Central Command announced Saturday that it launched a task force 'that will support ongoing U.S. government efforts to prevent Iran from using ground routes to transport advanced weapons and other materials.'" — Fox News Digital, Iran war live updates, Nov. 7, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: CENTCOM’s Nov. 7 release says Adm. Brad Cooper directed the formation of Task Force Iron Gate to “support ongoing U.S. government efforts to prevent Iran from using ground routes to transport advanced weapons and other materials,” the exact language Fox quotes. Fox’s added details, an internal staff of about 20 civilian and military personnel in Tampa covering Iran’s land borders and the Caspian Sea, also match the release. The release is CENTCOM’s own description; it does not show what the task force has done yet.

What would change our rating: A CENTCOM correction or withdrawal of the Nov. 7 release, or a later official statement describing a different mission, size or launch date for Task Force Iron Gate, would move this verdict.

The claim: “"A nuclear deal between the US and the Saudis currently under congressional review would provide a pathway for the kingdom to enrich uranium on its own soil if specific conditions, including US approval, are met." — CNN, Davis Winkie, Nov. 7, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: House Document 119-191 shows the agreement was formally transmitted to Congress and referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Aug. 27, 2026, starting the Atomic Energy Act's 90-day continuous-session review, which had not run out by Nov. 7. The transmittal says the deal would permit sensitive nuclear technology transfers to support a joint enrichment and conversion study or upon written agreement of the parties, and the Arms Control Association's review of the text says enrichment may occur only if the parties agree in writing after that study, starting at 5 percent. That is a conditional pathway requiring U.S. consent, as CNN says.

What would change our rating: A passed joint resolution of disapproval, the review period ending so the deal enters into force, or a release of the classified side letters showing enrichment without U.S. consent would move this verdict.

The claim: “"You failed me. There's consequences since you are an enemy of the greatest president to ever live." / "Hope you like cancel culture." — fabricated Truth Social screenshot circulated as a Donald Trump post after the 2026 midterms (documented by Snopes, Nov. 6, 2026)”

Why we rated it this way: Snopes reports the viral screenshot omits timestamp and engagement metrics and matches no post on Trump's Truth Social account or in archives that retain deleted posts. The archive instead records Trump's muted election-night message that he was not on the ballot and would have won in a landslide if he had been.

What would change our rating: An authentic Truth Social status from @realDonaldTrump containing the 'consequences'/'cancel culture' meltdown text, with a verifiable status ID and capture in Trump's Truth or another deletion-aware archive, would move this toward Matches record.

The claim: “"Vice President JD Vance wrote a lengthy social media post on Wednesday blaming the Iran war for the GOP's ill fortunes this election cycle." — Fox News Digital live updates, Nov. 5, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: Vance's Nov. 4 X post is a long diagnosis of the midterm loss that repeatedly centers the Iran war, including the line "The reason we lost is the war" and a pollster ranking that puts "End the war" first among switchers. That matches Fox's summary that he blamed the Iran war for the GOP's midterm fortunes.

What would change our rating: Evidence that the Vance post was fabricated, deleted and replaced with different text, or never said the war was the reason for the loss would move this off Matches record.

The claim: “"Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Quiñones departure in a social media post Friday, saying that the department is 'grateful for Jason's leadership.'" — CNN, Hannah Rabinowitz and Evan Perez, Nov. 6, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: Blanche's Friday X post announces that Quiñones submitted his resignation and thanks him with the grateful-for-leadership language CNN quotes. Quiñones's own X post the same day states he submitted his resignation effective that day, corroborating the departure CNN reports.

What would change our rating: Evidence that Blanche's announcement was fabricated or that Quiñones did not resign as SDFL U.S. Attorney on Nov. 6, 2026 would move this to Contradicted.

The claim: “"An alert poll worker in Michigan has detected a Wi-Fi signal prior to closure of the polls that appears to be connected to a foreign Wi-Fi device inside a tabulator." — claim Lara Logan amplified on X on Nov. 3, 2026 (239,900 views in a day, per NewsGuard), adding, "Here you go - thank the lord people are now savvy to the cheat."”

Why we rated it this way: NewsGuard reports Michigan’s Bureau of Elections says ballot tabulators are not connected to the internet while votes are being tabulated, so they cannot link to a foreign Wi-Fi device during counting. The Michigan SOS election-security guidance stresses paper ballots, sealed containers, and bipartisan canvass checks of printed tabulator tapes; WKAR’s election-security FAQ, citing that same SOS page, states machines cannot be online during tabulation and may only connect afterward to send unofficial results alongside a hard-copy tally.

What would change our rating: A Bureau of Elections or county-clerk finding that a certified Michigan tabulator was online and receiving a foreign Wi-Fi signal during live tabulation on Nov. 3, 2026, would move this toward Matches record; a completed canvass or audit naming the claimed device as unrelated consumer Wi-Fi would keep it Contradicted.

The claim: “"In the Senate, Democrats scored seven pickups on Election Night, with outstanding races in Alaska and Mississippi still waiting to be called." — Fox News Digital, Alex Miller and Elizabeth Elkind, Nov. 5, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: AP reported Democrats flipped at least seven Senate seats and named the same wave of ruby-red and battleground pickups Fox cited in its post-election roundup—Kansas, Iowa, Texas, Ohio, Maine, North Carolina, and South Carolina—while noting other races were still being counted. Fox’s framing that seven seats had already flipped on Election Night, with Alaska and Mississippi outstanding, lines up with that AP balance-of-power reporting.

What would change our rating: An AP or Senate clerk revision showing fewer than seven partisan Senate flips once Alaska and Mississippi are resolved would move this toward Contradicted; additional called flips beyond seven would not change the Election Night seven-pickup claim.

The claim: “"We now have the keys to the car…" and, touting his win, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro "pointed out that now 9 of the 10 largest states will have Democratic governors" — CNN Politics, Edward-Isaac Dovere, Nov. 5, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: Census-based 2026 state population rankings put California, Texas, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, and Michigan as the ten largest. After the midterms, MultiState’s governor results show Democratic winners or continuing Democratic governors in nine of those ten, including Gina Hinojosa’s AP-called flip in Texas; Republican Byron Donalds held Florida, the lone Republican among the top ten.

What would change our rating: A reversed call in Texas, Ohio, Georgia, or another top-ten state that left two or more of the ten largest with Republican governors would move this toward Contradicted; a Florida Democratic flip would make it 10 of 10 without changing the 9-of-10 claim.

The claim: ““The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.” — Vice President JD Vance, post on X, Nov. 4, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: On Fox News on election night Trump did say “I think a part of it was Iran,” so Vance is right that the president tied the losses to the war in some way. But in the same coverage Trump told Bret Baier “I don't think it's the war, Bret, I think it's the gasoline price,” and said people “agree with what I'm doing on Iran.” Trump called the war one factor and pointed mainly to gas prices, which is not the same as saying the war was the reason.

What would change our rating: A recording or transcript of a different Trump remark on Nov. 3-4 in which he names the war itself as the main reason Republicans lost would move this to matches record.

The claim: ““Hinojosa framed the race as a fight against an affordability crisis … a message that carried her to victory and ended 36 years of Republican control of the governor’s office.” — Fox News, Elaine Mallon, Nov. 4, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The Texas State Library lists Democrat Ann Richards as governor from January 15, 1991, to January 17, 1995, followed by Republicans George W. Bush, Rick Perry and Greg Abbott. That makes the Republican hold about 32 years when Hinojosa takes office in January 2027, not 36. The 36-year figure matches the time since a Democrat last won the office, Richards in 1990, and CNN described it as 'more than three decades.'

What would change our rating: An official Texas record showing a Republican governor in office from 1991 to 1995, or a Fox correction explaining a different way of counting, would change this.

The claim: ““The Senate has much more clearly defined legal power to sue in court to force compliance with its probes. A law passed in 1978 explicitly gives federal courts the authority to order compliance with subpoenas issued by the Senate that meet certain conditions.” — CNN, Maureen Chowdhury, Katelyn Polantz and Tierney Sneed, Nov. 4, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The statute is real: Public Law 95-521, signed Oct. 26, 1978, gives the federal court in Washington power to order people to comply with Senate subpoenas and to hold them in contempt. But the law says it does not apply to subpoenas sent to executive branch officers acting in their official capacity when they refuse on the basis of a government privilege the executive branch has authorized. CNN does say 'certain conditions,' but in a story about investigating the Trump administration, that carve-out matters most, since it covers the officials most likely to resist.

What would change our rating: A court ruling or a later amendment that applies Section 1365 to executive branch officials claiming government privilege would move this to matches record.

The claim: ““If we win the election, everybody is going to get $5,000. Every adult is going to get $5,000, but you have to spend it in the United States of America.” — President Donald Trump, remarks at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Nov. 2, 2026, as reported by Newsweek”

Why we rated it this way: In the Roll Call Factba.se transcript of his Nov. 2 Reflecting Pool speech, Trump says “if we win the election, everybody is going to get $5,000,” but the only official document on the plan, the White House’s Sept. 10 “Trump Dividend” release, names no funding source, administering agency, eligibility rules or payment date. No bill creating the payment has been introduced or passed; Sen. Bernie Moreno has said he will offer one only after the Nov. 3 election, and House Speaker Mike Johnson told the AP the payment needs congressional approval. So the pledge is a conditional campaign promise, not an authorized or funded program, and a Republican win alone would not put money in anyone’s account.

What would change our rating: A bill authorizing and appropriating the $5,000 payments passing Congress and being signed, or Treasury/IRS publishing eligibility rules and a payment schedule, would make the promise a funded program; an enacted law or a court ruling showing the president can pay it without Congress would also change the verdict.

The claim: ““Election day is Wednesday and the #FBI is working around the clock to ensure the midterms are safe.” — official X account of FBI New Haven (@FBINewHaven), Nov. 2, 2026, as documented by Lead Stories”

Why we rated it this way: Federal law, 2 U.S.C. 7, sets congressional Election Day as “the Tuesday next after the 1st Monday in November, in every even numbered year,” which in 2026 is Tuesday, Nov. 3, not Wednesday. The Congressional Research Service's Election Day FAQ likewise lists the next federal election as November 3, 2026. Lead Stories reports the post came from the FBI field office's official account, which the FBI website links to, and that it had asked the office for comment; the record shows the date was wrong, not why it was posted.

What would change our rating: Nothing in the record could make Wednesday correct for the federal election; a correction or deletion by FBI New Haven, or an FBI statement explaining the post, would be added as context but would not change the verdict.

The claim: ““Plus, all but four states are holding legislative elections. And voters will also weigh in on 145 statewide ballot measures in states from coast to coast.” — Fox News report by Paul Steinhauser, Nov. 3, 2026”

Why we rated it this way: The National Conference of State Legislatures says legislative races will be held in 46 states on Nov. 3, covering 88 of the nation's 99 chambers and 6,139 seats, and that Louisiana, Mississippi, New Jersey and Virginia hold no legislative races because they vote in odd-numbered years. That matches Fox's “all but four states.” On the secondary figure, NCSL's elections hub counts 146 statewide ballot measures in 39 states and the Northern Mariana Islands, one more than Fox's 145, a gap that likely reflects how each counts measures.

What would change our rating: An NCSL or state election office record showing a fifth state with no legislative races, or regular races in one of the four odd-year states, would move this to Contradicted; a final certified ballot-measure count well off 145 would add Missing context.